I understand that this could be quite subjective but I find that I can’t watch through the first 15 minutes of most modern horror films, as they’re either so bad or so predictable that you can guess the outcome of the film before you’ve finished it.
I’m a tradtionalist when it comes to this genre; I still like Blair Witch Project even though nothing much happens, but to tell the truth it’s films like that that so many others learnt from and built on. The original Alien film was made on that premise… in that you don’t really see the namesake.
There are some films that have followed this particular trait. The Hills Have Eyes 2006 remake was redone following the success of others (Texas Chainsaw, Amityville Horror) and is great as you don’t see any of the action until later on.
The original Texas Chainsaw (1974) is great for the same reason. The cinematography in that film is off the chart.
I’m not a fan of jump scares, and films that constantly build up from one scene to the next just to create that reaction. They tend to not have any plot either and for that reason they tend to be quite boring.
I’m open to suggestions though and happy to receive any recommendations!
When DVD first came along it was a revelation… streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime et al weren’t really such a big thing. I mean when Netflix first started, you used to get a DVD in the post. It was great, you could get a higher than normal definition film (720p) on a disk that would take up less space than a VHS and be at a higher quality. All the old films could be remastered and made available for the new series of flat screen TVs. I remember when DVD first came about, it was a BIG thing. All the tech firms were making players, and the combo VHS/DVD player recorders, that allowed you to rip your old tapes onto DVD.
Then the year 2000 came and went and Internet around 2003 really starting picking up. YouTube started in 2005 and the world of online video really started to kick off. Since then, no one has really looked back… I guess though, that DVD was also a greater format due to the increased amount of storage, but also as a natural evolution from the CD and a form of general data storage.
BluRay came at a tricky time as PCs were coming down in price and availability was increasing but at the same time USB storage was also coming down in price and if you wanted data backup you’d use an external disk and not a DVD or the upcoming Blu-Ray.
By this stage streaming services and fast broadband were becoming more widely available and more people were buying into it. It was cheaper to pay for a streaming service where you can watch a full HD (1080p) film, and older films, in full HD. If you compare the quality of an older DVD film and a full HD film, it’s like chalk and cheese 🙂
I’m a big fan of catalouging software MyMovies (esentially the film equivalent of Discogs), but they do need to introduce a streaming film / digital collection option as buying and renting full HD films online is now cheaper than buying the disk equivalent, even for 4K and higher films.
Blu-Ray come at a difficult time, when fast Internet and ease of access to streaming services go hand in hand!
What are your thoughts? Do you collect Blu-Rays or like to have the disks in your collection and the physical media or is the only thing you worry about, the fact you can watch full 1080p or higher films wherever you are?
Blu-Ray costs a lot to print and put out, whereas making the same available for streaming services is a lot less.
For those that don’t know, the original film stock media that cinema films are filmed on, can be remastered massively. At the time, the good old VHS was the only technology; then they could make it higher quality on DVD and then the Blu-Ray made it possible to load up the highest quality possible from a film that came out over half a century ago! And of course, now many films are filmed in 4K or higher in digital directly….. and of course the audo tracks could also be remastered (which takes up more space), and surround channels with 5.1 or higher channels.
Who doesn’t love cars and 70s culture? I’m a big car fan and it was probably through the film “Gone in 60 Seconds” (remake) that I first heard this song.
Reading into it a bit more and looking at the background behind the song and what it was all about got me looking at the low-rider scene. This is where paint, wire wheels and hydraulic suspension are all used to jack the car up at individual corners, often controlled remotely as well so the driver could use the car as a show piece whilst not driving – all very cool.
The band itself was made up of a multi-ethnic lineup and at the time did wonders to improve the acceptibilty of different races in pop music.
I hope you’ve enjoyed reading this, and now invite you to listen to the original video for the song. https://youtu.be/hg_KZQ7k3kI (unable to embed, sorry).
I probably need to thank Film4 for showing this film all those years ago, at least that’s where I think I first came to see it. It’s got a lot of everything in it: the music, the fashion, the dream of going on a trip and not looking back, the adventure, the women and more.
It’s a nitty gritty film with lots of action right from the off and something which keeps you watching right from the start.
Needless to say it also shows a lot about the South and how many people were still ridiculed for the way they dressed or how they looked. This is the era where race discrimination was still rife and even the police turned a blind eye a lot of the time.
The original cut of the film was going to be over 220 minutes but was later shortened to an acceptable length.
One fun fact is the motorbikes were all stolen before the final campfire scene which is why the bikes are no longer in the background.
If you haven’t watched it then you really must. It’s one of those films you need to see before you die!
Midsommar brightly dances through fields of tulips to create an unsettling depiction of emasculation. “That was a waste of time” muttered the viewers behind me. “What on earth is going on?” laughed the friends in front of me. “That was hilarious!” chuckled the imprudent heterosexual lads as I was walking out. Rather infuriatingly, as with most cases of contemporary filmmaking, I yearned to instantly throw a rebuttal at their faces. “What did you expect?”.
Sure, A24 were excessively marketing this as if it was a mainstream horror, but even from the promotional material you could tell it was a piece of contemporary art. Divisive both in content and in art from. And I couldn’t be any happier with the results. A group of friends, following recent dramatic trauma, travel to Sweden for a festival that occurs nearly every century. However, this festival is managed by a pagan cult who slowly envelope these tourists in a shroud of hallucinogenic transcendence.
With contemporary horror, and folk films in general, I repeatedly blurt out the phrase “you get out what you put in”. If you are close minded, despise ambiguity and are repulsed by a glacial narrative pace, this film is not for you. Midsommar is not a “horror” film intrinsically. Unsettling? Absolutely. But at its Swedish core is a drama depicting the tension of a relationship breakdown. The emotional tonality and instability of the looming presence of frailty with the one you cherish most. The horrific festivities and ceremonious rituals is a tantalising representation of the delirious pain and heightened hallucinatory dementedness that is often evoked in a long lasting relationship. Aster conveys the highs and lows through palpable events that conjure emotional turmoil for the characters. Which brings me to the “style over substance” argument.
Often, as is the case with many ambiguous visions, the story and character development is more transparent than literal. The progression of these friends isn’t necessarily painted in black and white, but watercolour instead. Dani in particular undergoes the most expressive development. Representing a weak and unstable state of mind during her family trauma, only to the increasingly grow stronger as she welcomes resentment and bitterness. Perfectly performed by Pugh who is fast becoming a global sensation. I knew she was one to watch ever since ‘Lady Macbeth’. Her other peers, arguably, garner less screen time and are mere expendable assets to the folk horror vibe that Aster has lovingly shot. And trust me when I say this film is beautiful.
Far too many breathtaking camera angles and one take sequences that left me picking my jaw up off the floor. It’s not often an unsettling film such as this is entirely shot in broad daylight and still produce the same effect. Just awe-inspiring, and Aster continues to be a talent to watch blossom. His ability to allow multiple interpretations exhume from the same story is effortless. A colossal amount of allegories and depictions, ranging from: spirituality, religion, matriarchal cultism, modernisation and emasculation.
The final scene, being one of the most provocatively artistic moments in the film, resembling the interconnectedness of community and family. A theme explored heavily in Aster’s previous directorial efforts, ‘Hereditary’. And in some ways, this is a companion piece to that. Which brings me to the same criticism that I had with ‘Hereditary’. Aster is simply unable to satisfyingly produce a third act that seemingly keeps in tone with the preceding plot. Less is more. Unfortunately the shock value ramps up rapidly without much development and fails to resonate with me personally. The psychedelic visuals and bloody rituals accelerate faster than a flower blooming, and just loses its grip.
Can I recommend this film? Of course I can. Will I recommend this film? No. This is a divisive film that, whilst open to interpretation, is a film you need to want to watch. It’s contemporary filmmaking at its best, that just loses its folkish edge towards its climax.
This was a gag on The Big Bang Theory a while ago, but all the same I realised that I didn’t really know myself which was better so decided to do some digging.
Leonard: Alicia, what do you want as your default setting for DVDs, 5.1 Dolby or DTS? Alicia: Whatever you think is best, cutie. Leonard: Well, DTS has more low end, so… okay
By default our Marantz surround sound receiver has both, but we tend to play using Dolby Digital in Movie mode. And to tell the truth it does sound fine to my ears.. but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s the best.
Two similar films in concept, but with a completely different plot. One I think didn’t work that great, but still seemed to get a whole load of awards and nominations. One that frustrated me so much that I was originally going to write this post to slate it. Without holding back, here we go.
Fronted by husband and wife team, Emily Blunt and John Krasinski, “a family is forced to live in silence while hiding from monsters with ultra-sensitive hearing.” To add to that, it’s set in a post apocalyptic world – sounds great right? I thought so too for the first 30 minutes or so. It set off really well. It built up the story line really well, and was genuinely eerie until they presented the monsters. I thought they had honestly added them in as an afterthought. It’s kind of like Alien, as you don’t really see the whole thing, but you see bits. I think it certainly would have been better leaving you knowing what was happening rather than presenting that to you.
For me, after that point, the film did go down hill. I lost interest in it and got really frustrated with it.
I think some of this may be down to its short running time (only 90 minutes) and trying to fill such a small amount of time with such a large concept, or maybe what was in fact so good was the lack of any dialogue.
So to skip to the chase, Birdbox, a film fronted by Sandra Bullock (I’d rather go back and watch Speed again), for the most part, with some cameos from other well known actors, works on a similar premise but instead of not being able to make a noise, the people are attacked if they see the “monster”. I’ll try not to delve too much deeper as I don’t want to include any plot spoilers. Unlike A Quiet Place, everyone must remain blindfolded when outdoors, or keep shutters and curtains closed when indoors, to protect themselves from what is outside.
The film is a little longer at 124 minutes long, but actually doesn’t feel that long. It had some interesting plot twists as well, and although a lot of critics are killing it with poor ratings, I felt it fared better than A Quiet Place overall.
IMDb rating 6.7/10 My rating 6/10 (more reasonable, eh!)
Conclusion
Having read into both films, it has been brought to my attention that I should really go and watch The Happening which is also similar in genre. Overall I really am not a big “horror” or post-apocalyptic type films, which fuels my dislike for films such as these, but I’ll leave you to make up your own mind on both.
We use a number of different services to catalogue what we watch and listen to. I’m a bit of a stats geek so to begin with these are what we use to keep track of everything.
Last.fm – used to be massive but we still love it. Track all the music you listen to and compare trends. You play music in iTunes or Spotify, and it keeps count. They have a great guide with links to all the apps and services supported. This is a free service. My username is tobyw7 and Annabelle’s is AnnaC7
Discogs – catalogue your music collection. Started using this when I got my record player last year and I’m now loving it. I buy the majority of my LPs via the Discogs marketplace which is a dedicated buy/sell site for music. The mobile app keeps getting better! My account is tobyw7 (spot the trend!)
My Movies (app) – introduced by my girlfriend’s Dad, John. This is proper nerd stuff, catalogue your entire movie collection, add tags, labels, filter by genre, actor, and anything else you can imagine. Direct links to IMDb, and to trailers. The app is free for up to 50 titles but it’s well worth paying for. We love it! Check it out at www.mymovies.dk
Internet Movie Database (IMDb) – Now owned by Amazon but still as good (until they removed the forums). Our inspiration for creating this blog, was the removal of the forums and to open a place for discussion and comment. We wouldn’t be without this site, and would probably still be cycling through our Apple TV trying to find something to watch! Your go to resource for any film buff. Check it out at www.imdb.com
